Sootypaws graphic
link to Home link to Off the Grid link to Journals link to Blacksmithing
link to Woods
What Happened at Fernow    

This is an examination of the chemicals used in drilling and found in waste, and their management.

Landspraying
   
What Happened at Fernow
      
Fernow Experimental Forest
      Discharge Monitoring Report
      
Chloride Load
      SAR
      Liming the Pit
      A Short History of Fracturing
      Fracturing Chemicals
      What Happened at Fernow
      
Recommendations & Sources

Drilling Waste Management
  
What Happened at Fernow
  
The Spill at Buckeye Creek

The Gas Well Study

Reclamation

The Old Well



 

Recommendations

We believe that vegetation death during the landspraying at Berry Energy's B800 well in the Fernow Experimental Forest was due to an extremely high chlorides load and possibly also to an extremely high pH of the liquids. We also believe high sodium load will affect the landsprayed areas in the future.

The state's landspraying program allows operators to deposit high chloride drill waste without consideration of load. The state's permitting the landspraying of fracturing chemicals and flowback encourages the extremely high concentrations of chlorides found in West Virginia landsprayed waste.

We've seen analysis of a number of pits of drill waste liquids in another state where the chlorides concentration ranged between 30 mg/l to 280 mg/l. These were high volume pits containing between a quarter and a half million gallons. By contrast, the Berry Energy well's pit held 100,000 gallons with a concentration of 6,210 mg/l chlorides (by Berry declaration, other testing showed more than twice that concentration).

West Virginia's program should incorporate load per acre for salinity (chlorides or some other measure) and should drastically limit the upper level of chlorides to 3,000 mg/l maximum concentration.

There's every reason to believe that the SAR for the landsprayed waste at Fernow was at an unreasonably high level. We recommend that a sodium load mechanism is required in the state's permit to prevent destruction of soil and long term negative impacts on vegetation.

The state's waste management program depends on operators' on-site testing of pit fluids. The wide variance between Berry's and Forest Service's results from testing of pit liquids shows several problems with the state's program. We recommend testing should be done by a state sanctioned laboratory. We also believe that guidelines for how samples are to be collected are necessary.

In addition to the testing of pit waste liquids, we also recommend that laboratory testing of the soil before and after land application is necessary as a final examination of the operator's performance.

The state's program needed to have means to predict and prevent what happened at the Fernow Experimental Forest. At present the state doesn't have an effective waste management program.

 

Sources

This is a partial listing of some of the sources cited.

EPA. 1994. R.E.D. Facts, 2,2-dibromo-3-nitrilio-propionamide (DBNPA). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, EPA-738-F-94-023.

EPA. 2000. Associated Waste Report: Completion and Workover Wastes. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. (This is an important resource and Appendix C provides a detailed chemical analysis of waste constituents for several wells.)

EPA. 2004. Evaluation of Impacts to Underground Sources of Drinking water by Hydraulic Fracturing of Coalbed Methane Resources. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water (4606M), EPA 816-R-04-003. (Information about gel-type fracturing and chemicals in Chapter 4, but flawed study.) Chapters or the whole document can be downloaded. Chapter 4 Hydraulic Fracturing Fluids is available.

Howat, D. R. 2000. Acceptable Salinity, Sodicity and pH Values for Boreal Forest Reclamation. Edmonton, Alberta: Alberta Environment, Environmental Sciences Division, Report # ESD/LM/00-2.

Keister, Timothy. Marcellus Gas Well Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal, Treatment, and Recycle Technology. Apache Junction, AZ: ProChemTech International, Inc. (Discusses constituents of fracturing flowback, fracturing additives and treatment.)

Kozlowski, T. T. 1997. Responses of Woody Plants to Flooding and Salinity. Tree Physiology Monograph No. 1. Victoria, Canada: Heron Publishing.

Monk, George and Schaffnit, Molly. n.d. Drill Mud Additives. Drilling Waste Management section of Sootypaws website.

Monk George and Schaffnit, Molly. n.d. Comments for the Draft Industry Guidance, Gas Well Drilling/Completion Large Water Volume Fracture Treatments. (Includes West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection's Draft Industry Guidance Gas Well Drilling/Completion Large Water Volume Fracture Treatments, 13 March 2009.)

Saskatchewan Energy and Mines. 1999. Saskatchewan Drilling Waste Management Guidelines. n.p.: Saskatchewan Energy and Mines, Petroleum Development Branch, GL99-01.

State Review of Oil and Natural Gas Environmental Regulations, Inc. 2003. West Virginia Follow-Up and Supplemental Review. n.p.: State Review of Oil and Natural Gas Environmental Regulations, Inc.

Sumi, Lisa. 2005. Our Drinking Water at Risk: What the EPA and the Oil and Gas Industry Don't Want Us to Know about Hydraulic Fracturing. Durango, CO: Oil & Gas Accountability Project. (Excellent rebuttal to EPA 2004. Table 2 on page 7 provides an estimate of chemical concentrations of substances appearing on Table 4-1 of EPA 2004.)

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection. 2008. Memorandum, Large Volume Pit/Pond Operators. West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection.

 

   

The Gas Well
The Old Well | Reclamation| Gas Well Study
Drilling Waste Management | What Happened at Fernow | The Spill at Buckeye Creek